Become a Member

Regulation TrackerLaws, orders and treaties read for their security duties and clocks Standards & FrameworksAttack taxonomies, control catalogues and frontier frameworks AI Incident DatabaseThe security incident record, with mechanism and lesson Research Paper LibraryThe papers that define the field, summarised OSS DirectoryRed teaming, guardrail, supply chain and evaluation tools Case StudiesProgrammes built, with measured outcomes AI Vulnerability TrackerCVEs and advisories for the components AI systems are built from

Latest in the tracker

New York Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act and implementing rulesNew York's law restricting algorithmic feeds for minors takes effect on 25 January 2027 under final rules published in July 2026, with certified age assurance and $5,000-per-violation penalties.

Knowledge Base Regulation Tracker Standards & Frameworks OSS Directory AI Incident Database Research Paper Library Case Studies Society Articles News Jobs About Charter Become a Member

Home/Research Paper Library/Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores

Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores

The impossibility theorem showing fairness criteria conflict, which explained why the COMPAS debate could not be settled by metrics alone.

fairnessimpossibilitycompas

Research question

Can calibration and error-rate balance be satisfied simultaneously?

Key findings

Except in degenerate cases, calibration and balance across groups cannot all hold - Formalises the COMPAS dispute

Sources

arxiv.orghttps://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05807

Contribute

Spot an error, or know a record we should add? Members can propose additions and submit corrections.

Submit research Report a correction or request removal