Become a Member

Regulation TrackerLaws, orders and treaties read for their security duties and clocks Standards & FrameworksAttack taxonomies, control catalogues and frontier frameworks AI Incident DatabaseThe security incident record, with mechanism and lesson Research Paper LibraryThe papers that define the field, summarised OSS DirectoryRed teaming, guardrail, supply chain and evaluation tools Case StudiesProgrammes built, with measured outcomes AI Vulnerability TrackerCVEs and advisories for the components AI systems are built from

Latest in the tracker

New York Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act and implementing rulesNew York's law restricting algorithmic feeds for minors takes effect on 25 January 2027 under final rules published in July 2026, with certified age assurance and $5,000-per-violation penalties.

Knowledge Base Regulation Tracker Standards & Frameworks OSS Directory AI Incident Database Research Paper Library Case Studies Society Articles News Jobs About Charter Become a Member

Home/Research Paper Library/Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answers

Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answers

The first positive empirical result for debate as scalable oversight, an ICML 2024 best paper.

debatescalable oversightempirical

Research question

Does debate help weaker judges reach the truth as debaters become more persuasive?

Key findings

Non-expert judges reach 88% accuracy with debate versus 60% without on QuALITY - Optimising debaters for persuasiveness improved judge accuracy

Sources

arxiv.orghttps://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06782

Contribute

Spot an error, or know a record we should add? Members can propose additions and submit corrections.

Submit research Report a correction or request removal