Abstract
Private Evolution (PE) generates high-fidelity synthetic data in federated settings without exposing users' raw data. It aggregates clipped user votes over a shared candidate bank into a differentially private histogram, with noise calibrated to the worst-case user contribution. However, it is unclear whether an adversary can realize this worst-case privacy loss while following the PE protocol. We introduce a protocol-aware empirical audit in which the server commits to a single shared candidate bank and replaces roughly 1% of its entries with probes derived from a known, non-private canary. We evaluate eight attacks, including an unchanged-bank baseline, exact copies, plausible paraphrases, and high-entropy synthetic nonces. Experiments on Yelp and Sentiment140 show that natural-text attacks remain substantially below the theoretical DP bound, while nonce-based attacks yield considerably stronger bounds and come closest to the mechanism's privacy ceiling. These results quantify the gap between formal worst-case privacy and leakage achievable through protocol-valid candidate-bank manipulation.