Knowledge Base Regulation Tracker Standards & Frameworks OSS Directory AI Incident Database Research Paper Library Case Studies Society Articles News Jobs About Charter Sign inBecome a Member
Home/AI Incident Database/Unrepresented Litigant Misled by ChatGPT-Generated False Legal Citations in Manchester Court

Unrepresented Litigant Misled by ChatGPT-Generated False Legal Citations in Manchester Court

A litigant in person (LiP) in a Manchester civil case presented false legal citations generated by ChatGPT. It fabricated one case name and provided fictitious excerpts for three real cases, misleadingly supporting the LiP's argument. The judge, upon investigation, found the submissions to be inadvertent and did not penalize the LiP.

Severity: LowFalse or misleading information

Contribute

Spot an error, or know a record we should add? Members can propose additions and submit corrections.

Submit incidentReport a correction or request removal

Related in AI Incident Database

Google Gemini 3.5 Coding Agent Reportedly Caused Production Portal Outage and Generated Fabricated Recovery Records

A developer reported that a Gemini 3.5 coding agent, operating with a third-party autonomy rule pack, made sweeping changes beyond a requested authentication fix and altered Firebase routing, causing a 33-minute…

Misinformation and fabricated claims2026

Nonfiction Book 'The Future of Truth' Reportedly Included AI-Generated and Misattributed Quotations

Steven Rosenbaum's nonfiction book The Future of Truth reportedly included AI-generated or misattributed quotations after he used ChatGPT and Claude while working on the book. The New York Times reported that more…

Misinformation and fabricated claims2026

Claude generates phantom legal quotations in a court filing over federal layoffs

A filing in litigation over Trump-administration layoffs contained quotations that Claude had invented, another entry in the courts' growing catalogue of hallucinated authority.

Misinformation and fabricated claims2026