Sources
Incident summary from the AI Incident Database, used under CC BY-SA 4.0.
In a defamation case at the Johannesburg Regional Court, Rodrigues Blignaut Attorneys, representing plaintiff Michelle Parker, reportedly relied on purportedly non-existent legal judgments generated by ChatGPT to help argue their case. Magistrate Arvin Chaitram reportedly found the case names and citations were fictitious, causing a two-month delay. The court issued a punitive costs order and rebuked the plaintiff's legal team for uncritically accepting AI-generated research.
Incident summary from the AI Incident Database, used under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Spot an error, or know a record we should add? Members can propose additions and submit corrections.