Sources
Incident summary from the AI Incident Database, used under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Home/AI Incident Database/Alleged Fake Citations Undermine Expert Testimony in Minnesota Deepfake Law Case
Alleged Fake Citations Undermine Expert Testimony in Minnesota Deepfake Law Case
In a legal case defending Minnesota’s deepfake election misinformation law, Stanford misinformation expert Professor Jeff Hancock's affidavit allegedly cited non-existent academic sources, potentially generated by ChatGPT. The reportedly fabricated citations appear to have undermined the credibility of his testimony.
Contribute
Spot an error, or know a record we should add? Members can propose additions and submit corrections.